整了套绞牙配件（更新pp）

速度快的么。。。。。前10后8太硬了吧。。。。。。。。车轻哎。。。。 +2y&B,L_Wh  
4d-q!lRpa  
17的圈。。。。。 。。。。。。搞好点的胎，别用玲珑，南港什么的。。。

引用

引用第8楼wgz1221zgw于2011-02-26 10:11发表的  : 74wa  
速度快的么。。。。。前10后8太硬了吧。。。。。。。。车轻哎。。。。 s#49pDN  
rMloj8O*  
17的圈。。。。。 。。。。。。搞好点的胎，别用玲珑，南港什么的。。。

AlV2tffY^  
绞牙弹簧用多少k合适？轮胎够用就好了，呵呵！

引用

引用第9楼hxf于2011-02-26 10:14发表的  : ^ DM^HSm  
7J.alV4`/  
绞牙弹簧用多少k合适？轮胎够用就好了，呵呵！

XN'x`%!*3#  
M\ B A+  
我先申明啊。。。。我没换过绞牙，到目前为止我还是在考虑该怎么整悬挂 YQ:FBj  
我是从MIVEC GROUP上看到人家有换过的人说的 TyI"fP  
http://www.mivec.co.nz/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=5669 9TuE.  
%9cu(yc*}  
e@}zp  
关于弹簧到底该用多少的K值。。。。是这么讨论的。 0.7*2s-  
P4@<`Eb  
Well i cant answer this fully, however Ralliart Replacement Front and Rear springs for the CJ4A were as follows )xtDiDB  
Gc6`]7 s  
Front options of 2.7kg/mm or 3.0kg/mm V$e\84<  
Rear options of 2.2kg/mm or 2.5kg/mm @#sBom+K`  
e>"/Uii  
So factory obviously is lighter than this, if you wanted to do a bit of track work and purchase some coilovers i found 7kg front springs and 5kg rear springs a good compromise between street/track, but if it was more street 6kg front 5kg rear is a good option "f'pa&oHi  
Iz;hje4JL  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- wr\d5j  
4qw&G  
Sorry prehistoric here in the UK can't deal with metric spring rates they mean nothing to me. /?b<}am  
D_E^%Ea&`  
Standard Gen 1 non Cyborg spring rates IIRC are (tGK~!cAv  
v~73  
F 145 lb/in 2.6kg/mm Xmy(pV!PF  
R 100 lb/in 1.79kg/mm &..![,)w^!  
=1n>vUW+J  
/S9Mu )1Y  
I am told the spring rates on the works Proton (ie Gen 1) S1600 rally cars were/are
~C=`yj  
@t
jC{?5Y  
Tarmac zG
Ze|-  
F 210 lb/in 3.75 kg/mm v-G
(bw3  
R 130 lb/in 2.32 kg/mm ;5y4
v  
L?KEe>;r  
d2X#_(+d  
Gravel i-E&Y*\^9H  
F 190 lb/in 3.39 kg/mm U7x}p^B9\N  
R 130 lb/in 2.32 kg/mm ;yk@`<  
8%nTDSp&t  
Note the rear rates are the same for gravel and tarmac. ?on3 z  
kc"U)>  
D
%
50  
Given the small difference between standard and rally spec I doubt the Cyborg would be much above teh standard models. I realise the CJ is a slightly heavier car but with the same suspension design the rates are only going to be slightly higher to counter the weight xSLN  
ke/o11LP  
0c`w
JktWK  
The rates you quote cameron are those usually offered and recommended for the much heavier latter EVO models, IMHO they are far too stiff for all but the smoothest race tracks. f:BW{Cij;y  
;,IGO7R  
Golden rule is as soft as possible but as hard as necessary (to manage roll in order to maintain geometry). X +hyUz(%R  
"S6d^  
------------------------------------------ $e0sa=/  
T}U`?s`)  
具体的你自己看吧。。。。另外我问过BC的工程师关于BC V2的弹簧，他们的回答是 前5后4。。。。BC V2的定位应该属于街道舒适版的。。。。我相信这样的值一定有它自己的理由。。。。。。所以，我相信除非你想跑赛道，否则用前10后8会给平时带来很麻烦的问题

一般好象车重的用K值大的弹簧没问题，车重么，压得住呀，我们这车。。。还是太轻了点。

哦，好的。试一试看看，如果太硬就重配弹簧

引用

引用第12楼hxf于2011-02-26 11:25发表的  : jF$bCbAUce  
哦，好的。试一试看看，如果太硬就重配弹簧

h 8%(,$*  

kk`K)PESi  
真羡慕你。。。。。。搞啥都方便

引用

引用第13楼wgz1221zgw于2011-02-26 12:13发表的  : b0se -#+  
(g
cy3BX;  
F^}d>2W(  
真羡慕你。。。。。。搞啥都方便

KXWz(L!1  
？？？只要你想做什么都会变得简单！！

我前八后六都硬啊。。应该前六后四比较舒服点吧。。期待~~~~~~~~~